BenchLeader

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark

Verdict
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) leads on quality: 67.6 vs 64.6.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
  • Muse Spark is stronger in human preference, instruction following, multimodal.
MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5 (max)Muse Spark
BenchLeader Index67.664.6
Agents & tools score69.566.0
Coding score69.865.3
Composite score72.665.0
Knowledge score65.463.7
Long context score66.664.2
Maths score72.959.3
Reasoning score81.165.9
Human preference score–68.7
Instruction following score–78.3
Multimodal score–64.6
Blended price $/M$4.00–
Output speed141 tok/s–
Time to first answer487.1 s–
Context window1M262k
GPQA Diamond95.6%89.8%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–388.8%–
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%–
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%88.9%
SimpleQA Verified46.5%–
Humanity's Last Exam–40.6%
Terminal-Bench61.8%–
SciCode61.0%51.5%
APEX-Agents75.5%–
ProofBench100.0%17.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index–152.0
LMArena Text–1489
LMArena Hard Prompts–1506
LMArena Coding–1529
LMArena Vision–1306
LMArena Agent12–
LiveBench75.7%–
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%–
LiveBench Coding91.4%–
LiveBench Agentic Coding56.3%–
LiveBench Mathematics96.1%–
LiveBench Data Analysis59.5%–
LiveBench Language78.0%–
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.25631.3
IFBench–75.9%
AA-LCR82.7%78.0%
MMMU-Pro–80.5%
AA-Omniscience32.37.2
Terminal-Bench Hard–45.5%
GPQA Diamond (AA)–88.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.0%40.7%
SciCode (AA)61.0%–
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)–91.5%
AIME (Vals)–96.9%
MMLU-Pro–87.3%
LegalBench–84.2%
CorpFin–65.1%
TaxEval–77.7%
SWE-bench (Vals)–74.4%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)–89.7%
SWE-Bench Pro–55.0%
MCP Atlas–82.2%
MultiChallenge–75.5%
PRBench Finance–52.4%
PRBench Legal–52.3%
MultiNRC–59.0%
TutorBench–68.5%
CritPt31.4%11.3%
GDPval-AA v2.167.0%25.1%
Analyst Agent (AA)57.5%–
CaseLaw v2–63.1%
MedCode–51.3%
MedScribe–85.9%
MMMU-Pro (Vals)–87.4%
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals)–59.5%
Vibe Code Bench v1.1–19.7%
FORTRESS–20.2%
SWE-Bench Pro (private)–55.0%
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA–24.2%
SWE Atlas: Test Writing–31.1%
LMArena Maths–1466
LMArena Creative Writing–1465
LMArena Instruction Following–1464
LMArena Multi-turn–1493
LMArena Longer Queries–1476
LMArena Document–1467
Mystery Game Puzzles65.0%–
CursorBench55.5%–
FrontierSWE61.9%–
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)63.6%–
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)–62.2%
AutomationBench71.8%–
GDP.pdf25.8%–
MLCR75.0%–
Harvey LAB2.8%–
AA-Omniscience: accuracy54.0%49.6%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination53.0%15.8%
AA-Briefcase v1.11823–

Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark: questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) leads on quality: 67.6 vs 64.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in coding (70 vs 65 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark for agentic tasks?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (70 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which has the larger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.