BenchLeader

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.20

Verdict
  • Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 59.0.
  • Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.20 (thinking) is stronger in instruction following, multimodal.
  • Grok 4.20 (thinking) is 1.3× cheaper ($3.00 vs $4.00 per 1M blended).
MetricGemini 4 Argon (high)Grok 4.20 (thinking)
BenchLeader Index70.059.0
Agents & tools score67.551.7
Coding score72.153.9
Composite score89.258.5
Human preference score73.266.6
Knowledge score75.756.2
Long context score65.059.5
Maths score71.954.4
Reasoning score82.059.4
Instruction following score–79.9
Multimodal score–58.8
Blended price $/M$4.00$3.00
Output speed–103 tok/s
Time to first answer–18.5 s
Context window1M2M
GPQA Diamond–89.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3–44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4–17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME–92.2%
SimpleQA Verified–30.2%
SciCode61.8%–
ProofBench–14.0%
LMArena Text15251472
LMArena Hard Prompts15511489
LMArena Coding15621511
LMArena WebDev16781375
LMArena Vision–1263
LMArena Agent9.3–
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.252.625.7
IFBench–82.9%
AA-LCR79.7%69.0%
MMMU-Pro–74.6%
AA-Omniscience42.414.8
Terminal-Bench Hard–40.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)–91.1%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)57.1%34.5%
SciCode (AA)61.8%–
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)–96.5%
AIME (Vals)–96.5%
LiveCodeBench–84.3%
MMLU-Pro–86.3%
IOI100.0%–
LegalBench88.3%77.7%
CorpFin–63.7%
TaxEval–74.1%
MedQA–94.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)–44.2%
SWE-bench (Vals)–72.2%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)–88.6%
Vals Index68.9–
Kagi LLM Benchmark–75.0%
ARC-AGI-1–89.5%
ARC-AGI-2–65.1%
ARC-AGI-3–0.1%
CritPt27.1%6.6%
GDPval-AA v2.156.3%–
APEX-Agents (AA)–14.2%
BioMysteryBench76.3%–
CaseLaw v2–54.5%
Code Migration68.2%0.3%
CUA-bench4.8%–
CyberBench77.9%–
Excel Modeling Benchmark75.2%11.7%
Finance Agent v265.4%28.5%
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark19.6%0.0%
Legal Research Bench54.8%13.9%
MedCode58.8%32.2%
MedScribe87.4%63.4%
MMMU-Pro (Vals)–83.5%
MortgageTax–45.4%
MysteryMechanism45.5%–
ProgramBench2.5%–
Public Benefits Bench69.8%–
SAGE53.6%38.2%
SREBench44.3%–
Tax Agent Bench76.2%31.2%
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Vals)–40.5%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)57.6%–
Terminal-Bench Science44.3%–
Vals Multimodal Index–39.1%
Vibe Code Bench v1.191.9%4.1%
LMArena Maths15281465
LMArena Creative Writing15191445
LMArena Instruction Following15291447
LMArena Multi-turn15531479
LMArena Longer Queries15451466
LMArena Document–1439
Chess Puzzles–24.0%
ForecastBench–60.7%
FrontierSWE55.0%–
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)57.1%–
AutomationBench77.5%–
GDP.pdf21.8%–
AA-Omniscience: accuracy49.9%28.9%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination84.9%82.6%
AA-Briefcase v1.11488–

Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.20: questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Grok 4.20?
Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 59.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Grok 4.20 for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 54 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Grok 4.20 for agentic tasks?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 52 on the category index, where 50 is average).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Grok 4.20?
Grok 4.20 is cheaper: $3.00 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Grok 4.20 accepts more context: 2M against 1M tokens.