Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Gemini 4 Argon 
GPT-5.6 Sol Verdict
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 67.5.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is stronger in long context, instruction following, multimodal.
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) is 2.0× cheaper ($4.00 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (high) | GPT-5.6 Sol (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.0 | 67.5 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.5 | 66.5 |
| Coding score | 72.1 | 65.8 |
| Composite score | 89.2 | 75.4 |
| Human preference score | 73.2 | – |
| Knowledge score | 75.7 | 65.8 |
| Long context score | 65.0 | 67.3 |
| Maths score | 71.9 | 71.5 |
| Reasoning score | 82.0 | 72.7 |
| Instruction following score | – | 71.0 |
| Multimodal score | – | 66.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $8.00 |
| Output speed | – | 74 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 85.3 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 93.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 89.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 82.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 100.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 69.7% |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 37.3% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | – | 27.3% |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 57.1% |
| WeirdML | – | 87.0% |
| ProofBench | – | 83.0% |
| LMArena Text | 1525 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1551 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1562 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 9.3 | – |
| LiveBench | – | 81.0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 91.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 83.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 56.2% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 96.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 79.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 87.7% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 71.8% |
| AA Intelligence Index v4.3.2 | 52.6 | 47.0 |
| IFBench | – | 72.7% |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 84.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 83.4% |
| AA-Omniscience | 42.4 | 22.0 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 65.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 94.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 57.1% | 49.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.8% | 57.1% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 85.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 82.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.1% |
| IOI | 100.0% | 91.2% |
| LegalBench | 88.3% | 87.0% |
| CorpFin | – | 64.4% |
| TaxEval | – | 74.8% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 85.8% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 96.2% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 95.2% |
| Vals Index | 68.9 | 58.0 |
| PRBench Finance | – | 50.5% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 50.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | – | 96.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | – | 92.5% |
| ARC-AGI-3 | – | 7.8% |
| CritPt | 27.1% | 32.3% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 56.3% | 55.6% |
| τ³-Banking (AA) | – | 44.3% |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | – | 56.2% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | – | 47.5% |
| BioMysteryBench | 76.3% | 71.1% |
| Code Migration | 68.2% | 52.9% |
| CUA-bench | 4.8% | 8.3% |
| CyberBench | 77.9% | 76.3% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 75.2% | 72.3% |
| Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | 53.8% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | 2.5% |
| Legal Research Bench | 54.8% | 48.1% |
| MedCode | 58.8% | 44.0% |
| MedScribe | 87.4% | 85.2% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 88.8% |
| MortgageTax | – | 67.3% |
| MysteryMechanism | 45.5% | 33.3% |
| ProgramBench | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | 69.8% | 66.5% |
| SAGE | 53.6% | 52.6% |
| SkillsBench | – | 54.1% |
| SREBench | 44.3% | 30.5% |
| Tax Agent Bench | 76.2% | 68.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | 57.6% | 37.9% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | 44.3% | 20.0% |
| Time Horizon Index: KSP | – | 23.8% |
| Vals Multimodal Index | – | 72.6% |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 | – | 20.0% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | 91.9% | 80.5% |
| Web Search Index | – | 43.6% |
| LMArena Maths | 1528 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1519 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1529 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1553 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1545 | – |
| Chess Puzzles | – | 55.0% |
| EBR-bench | – | 44.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | – | 58.0% |
| BALROG | – | 60.0% |
| PostTrainBench | – | 36.2% |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | – | 72.7% |
| LMCA | – | 58.4% |
| DTBench | – | 95.5% |
| CursorBench | – | 41.7% |
| ALE-Bench | – | 2176.9 |
| GDP.pdf | – | 30.7% |
| FrontierSWE | 55.0% | 32.2% |
| BTF-3 | – | 13.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 57.1% | 39.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | – | 88.0% |
| AutomationBench | 77.5% | – |
| GDP.pdf | 21.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 49.9% | 59.4% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 84.9% | 7.8% |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1488 | – |
Data as of 2026-10-11. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.6 Sol: questions
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5.6 Sol?
- Gemini 4 Argon (high) leads on quality: 70.0 vs 67.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 4 Argon (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-10-11, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5.6 Sol for coding?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in coding (72 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 4 Argon better than GPT-5.6 Sol for agentic tasks?
- Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in agentic tasks (68 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-5.6 Sol?
- Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $4.00 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-5.6 Sol accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.