Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Grok 4.7 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- Grok 4.7 (high) and Muse Spark 1.1 are level on quality (65.8 vs 65.2).
- Grok 4.7 (high) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, instruction following, maths, multimodal.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is 1.5× cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 3.8× faster (210 vs 55 tokens per second).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (high) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.8 | 65.2 |
| Composite score | 87.5 | – |
| Knowledge score | 72.6 | 70.5 |
| Long context score | 64.8 | – |
| Reasoning score | 76.4 | 69.3 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 62.6 |
| Coding score | – | 68.0 |
| Human preference score | – | 66.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.8 |
| Maths score | – | 62.7 |
| Multimodal score | – | 64.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 55 tok/s | 210 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 1.4 s | 2.8 s |
| Context window | 500k | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 57.8% |
| SciCode | – | 58.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 41.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 39.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 154.6 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1493 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1513 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1542 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1294 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 46.3 | – |
| AA-LCR | 77.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 30.9 | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | – |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.8% | – |
| LegalBench | 85.1% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 57.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.6% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1260 |
| CritPt | 18.0% | – |
| GDPval (AA) | 59.7% | – |
| Code Migration | 34.7% | – |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | 54.9% | – |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | – |
| Legal Research Bench | 39.9% | – |
| MedCode | 48.7% | – |
| MedScribe | 87.2% | – |
| ProgramBench | 0.0% | – |
| Public Benefits Bench | 68.5% | – |
| SAGE | 31.0% | – |
| FORTRESS | – | 12.4% |
| SWE-Bench Pro (private) | – | 51.5% |
| VTB | – | 44.8% |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1451 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1471 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1497 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1481 |
| LMArena Document | – | 1480 |
| DeepSWE | – | 53.3% |
| GBAEval | – | 7.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | – | 6520.5 |
| GDP.pdf | – | 15.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-21. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions
- Is Grok 4.7 better than Muse Spark 1.1?
- Grok 4.7 (high) and Muse Spark 1.1 are level on quality (65.8 vs 65.2). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.7 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-21, but check the category scores for your use.
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 210 against 55 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 500k tokens.